[MERGE][1.7] Additional tweaks for init[-repo] quiet

Vincent Ladeuil v.ladeuil+lp at free.fr
Fri Sep 12 08:52:59 BST 2008

>>>>> "john" == John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> writes:

    john> Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
    >>>>>>> "robert" == Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> writes:
    robert> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:27 +0200, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
    >> >> >>>>> "robert" == Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> writes:
    >> >> 
    robert> So, I thought most folk were unhappy with the output of 'bzr init' in
    robert> 1.7 - can we back out the patch to spew info ?
    >> I seems to me that the patch got approved with:
    John> John Arbash Meinel has voted approve.
    John> Status is now: Approved
    John> Comment:
    John> I'm not sure if I specifically like this or not, but the patch
    John> looks good. I'm willing to have it brought in early in the
    John> release cycle, so we have a chance to decide whether we really
    John> like the behavior before it is released.
    >> But I don't remember the discussion...

    john> The thread is "bzr init suddenly got verbose" if you want to read
    john> through it.

<blush> Apologies to every participant of the thread, I'll tweak
some more (god, I was shocked myself to see the verbose=0
parameter.... but wrongly remembered some consensus about the
actual behavior :-/).


    john> BB:approve

    john> this for both bzr.dev and 1.7rc2.

    john> By the way, for patches that people want to get into
    john> 1.7, it would be nice if you based them on the 1.7
    john> branch, rather than bzr.dev.

I can't find a 1.7 series on launchpad, where is that branch
you're talking about and does pqm accept submissions for it (if
yes how ?) ?

    john> I can't merge this right now because PQM is wedged, but
    john> we should do so.

It's back.

More information about the bazaar mailing list