[MERGE][1.7] Additional tweaks for init[-repo] quiet
v.ladeuil+lp at free.fr
Fri Sep 12 08:52:59 BST 2008
>>>>> "john" == John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> writes:
john> Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>>>>>>> "robert" == Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> writes:
robert> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:27 +0200, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>> >> >>>>> "robert" == Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> writes:
robert> So, I thought most folk were unhappy with the output of 'bzr init' in
robert> 1.7 - can we back out the patch to spew info ?
>> I seems to me that the patch got approved with:
John> John Arbash Meinel has voted approve.
John> Status is now: Approved
John> I'm not sure if I specifically like this or not, but the patch
John> looks good. I'm willing to have it brought in early in the
John> release cycle, so we have a chance to decide whether we really
John> like the behavior before it is released.
>> But I don't remember the discussion...
john> The thread is "bzr init suddenly got verbose" if you want to read
john> through it.
<blush> Apologies to every participant of the thread, I'll tweak
some more (god, I was shocked myself to see the verbose=0
parameter.... but wrongly remembered some consensus about the
actual behavior :-/).
john> this for both bzr.dev and 1.7rc2.
john> By the way, for patches that people want to get into
john> 1.7, it would be nice if you based them on the 1.7
john> branch, rather than bzr.dev.
I can't find a 1.7 series on launchpad, where is that branch
you're talking about and does pqm accept submissions for it (if
yes how ?) ?
john> I can't merge this right now because PQM is wedged, but
john> we should do so.
More information about the bazaar