Performance requirements for bzr checkout --lightweight

[Jelmer Vernooij]

Am Montag, den 01.09.2008, 13:58 -0500 schrieb John Arbash Meinel:
> >> I realise that emphasising one operation doesn't necessarily
> >> help with performance optimisation, but I would like to
> >> ask for some attention to be paid to this operation. Ideally
> >> a lightweight checkout of a packaging branch would take less
> >> than 150% or 200% of the time for an "apt-get source" of the
> >> same package.
> > 
> > So does this mean we are at 100x, 10x, 3x? There is a lot of variance here. If
> > we were at 210%, *I* probably wouldn't focus on it (whether other people feel
> > it is critical). If we are at 100x then something needs to be done.
> > 
> > Also, is this with bzr-1.5 or 1.6? I know 1.6(.1) got a lot better at fetching
> > large (lots of files, not necessary lots of history) repositories.
> 
> So here is my numbers for doing "bzr co --lightweight lp:bzr", versus "apt-get
> source bzr" (which gives bzr 1.3.1).
> I'm also a bit surprised that "apt-get source bzr" tells you to go use the
> debian packaging directory rather than either the bzr trunk itself, or some
> ubuntu packages.
There is no separate packaging for Ubuntu, the bzr package in Ubuntu is
imported without change from Debian (if there would be changes, there
would be "ubuntuX" in the version string).

Cheers,

Jelmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080901/1421816f/attachment.pgp