RFC: revno pertubation rules

[Robert Collins]

On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 02:57 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 11:44 +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > tip advance
> > -----------
> > 
> > This can be reduced down to commit
> 
> Won't this re-number if I pull a branch that has just merged
> me, as my current tip is now not in the left-hand ancestory,
> and so will get a dotted revno?

See the discussion under rollback - thats rollback+advance up a
different path.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080814/14000d10/attachment.pgp