slower performance of log and annotate in 1.6?

[Robert Collins]

On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 15:56 -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> 
> 
> So, on a different "optimally unpacked" repository:

reformatting for my ease:
         1.3   dev  btree  bloom
log       36    43     31     31
log file  38   155     13     13

So,  I think we should just make a dev format with the simplest form of
b+trees - b+tree, no bloom, lean code - and let people see what we have
in the pipeline.

We can still test blooms more on groupcompress and bring them in later
as needed. Its highly likely IMO that we'd see more of a win on remote
operations, but b+tree's seem to be a sufficient win on their own that
I'd like the wider exposure we get by having them available in .dev -
and am happy to support people using them.

-Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080813/68de3df3/attachment.pgp