Branch fails from 'pack-0.92' repo to 'rich-root-pack' repo

[Ben Finney]

Aaron Bentley <aaron at aaronbentley.com> writes:

> This week, I hope to work on a format similar to rich-root-pack that
> *will* be a suitable default. As part of that work, I will be
> ensuring that all branches, even weird ones like BE, can be
> converted into that format.

How is this work going? Is it incorporated into the work in Bazaar
1.6? Is there a bug report I can look at to know the progress on this?

-- 
 \       “When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold to the masses |
  `\    over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and |
_o__)                    its speaker a raving lunatic.” —Dresden James |
Ben Finney