clean-tree in bzr core?

[Jelmer Vernooij]

Am Samstag, den 02.08.2008, 10:25 -0500 schrieb John Arbash Meinel:
> Daniel Watkins wrote:
> > On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:00:05 +0200
> > Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> wrote:
> >> Are there any objections to moving clean-tree into the core, thoughts?
> > +1 for moving the functionality in.  I didn't even realise that it was
> > part of bzrtools.  However, it might make sense for it to be part of
> > reconfigure, rather than a separate command...
> > 
[...]
> So...
> 
> I think it would be fine to bring in. I'm curious how other people would use
> it, and how you feel it would be appropriate for a generic project, rather
> than its current fairly bzr-specific implementation.
The only two "non-standard" things it appears to do are removing paths
with names ending in ".tmp" or "~" when --detritus is specified. Other
than that, it appears to be pretty generic. 

I tend to use "bzr clean-tree" when the number of temporary files I
created (test run output etc) starts to clutter up "bzr status". I also
sometimes use it to clean up compiled files when I don't trust the
distclean target of the project I'm working in to clean up really
everything.

Cheers,

Jelmer
-- 
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
Jabber: jelmer at jabber.fsfe.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080802/6927e885/attachment.pgp