Branch fails from 'pack-0.92' repo to 'rich-root-pack' repo

[Ben Finney]

Aaron Bentley <aaron at aaronbentley.com> writes:

> This week, I hope to work on a format similar to rich-root-pack that
> *will* be a suitable default. As part of that work, I will be
> ensuring that all branches, even weird ones like BE, can be
> converted into that format.

I can't find a bug report for this. Is there one?

-- 
 \      “At my lemonade stand I used to give the first glass away free |
  `\          and charge five dollars for the second glass. The refill |
_o__)                            contained the antidote.” —Emo Philips |
Ben Finney