Branch fails from 'pack-0.92' repo to 'rich-root-pack' repo

[Ben Finney]

On 2008-04-20, Aaron Bentley <aaron at aaronbentley.com> wrote:

> This week, I hope to work on a format similar to rich-root-pack that
> *will* be a suitable default.  As part of that work, I will be ensuring
> that all branches, even weird ones like BE, can be converted into that
> format.

How is this work going? Is there any hope to see it in Bazaar 1.6

-- 
 \         “I went to the museum where they had all the heads and arms |
  `\      from the statues that are in all the other museums.” —Steven |
_o__)                                                           Wright |
Ben Finney