Some timings using bzr

Robert Collins robertc at robertcollins.net
Fri Jul 11 10:42:51 BST 2008


On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 10:30 +0100, James Westby wrote:

> There are two important things to ensure. The first is that all
> users have a version of bzr that will understand the new format,
> i.e. they all have 0.92 or greater. The second is that all users
> upgrade their branches to the pack-0.92 format. While the formats
> will interoperate, pulling from pack-0.92 into dirstate-tags is
> very slow indeed. This is because they store different data, and
> so the extra data in the latter format must be regenerated on
> the fly, leading to very long pull times.

Actually, dirstate-tags to pack-0.92 and back should be just fine.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080711/59003076/attachment.pgp 


More information about the bazaar mailing list