update on stack merging

[John Arbash Meinel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin Pool wrote:
| Here are some incremental patches to fix some of the tests.  One of
| them I'm quite confident in, the other is a bit of a workaround for
| not being clear how to test it or what was intended, as the comment
| says.
|
|
|

Your "questionable" change seems to be changing the meaning of the test
quite a bit. Specifically, instead of testing that the target repository
doesn't have the old revisions, you are testing that the source
repository doesn't have the new revisions.

While I can agree that it might be good to test for that, it means that
a regular branch will work just fine, and doesn't need any stacking support.

I thought there was a way to ask a stacking repository for only the data
that it has locally. If there isn't we should probably add one and use
it here.

John
=:->

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkhzk0IACgkQJdeBCYSNAAOerwCfaYooVI8IF8k7qvu1+QW+RMy1
paUAoKxqoomqOjnnro9OdcamAQi8jMAC
=pq6E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----