[MERGE] ``bzr check`` CLI improvements

[Daniel Mark Watkins]

On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:25:42 +1000
Ian Clatworthy <ian.clatworthy at canonical.com> wrote:
> Please update the help for the check command to explain the behaviour
> when none of the (new) flags are given. Maybe add some examples as
> well.
Done.

> My main concern with the way you've implemented this is that running
> 
>   bzr check --tree
> 
> on a repository will silently do nothing. I'd expect it to complain. I
> guess I'm saying that explicitly asking for a check that can't be done
> isn't the same thing UI wise as "do the best you can at the given
> path". It's not something I feel strongly enough about to reject the
> patch on - what's you've done is a step forward - but I'd be happier
> if you came up with a solution.
This is fixed in the attached.  I've opted to just have it print a
message whenever something that the user is expecting to be checked is
not there.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: check-cli.2.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 19164 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080704/5da508e8/attachment-0001.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080704/5da508e8/attachment-0001.pgp