B+Tree indices: ongoing progress

[Robert Collins]

On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 16:51 -0500, John Arbash Meinel wrote:


> Not as much as I would have hoped for, but yes. And I've done enough
> tests now that I know it is actually correct. :)

I haven't run a test yet with -Dindex, but 256 byte blooms were a guess;
its entirely possible that we really want 512 byte blooms, given the
leaf node density. I'm going to fiddle with that after tackling node
parsing costs a little.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080703/5cbd19df/attachment.pgp