Loggerhead performance problem (Was: Re: Describe your workflow)

[Martin Albisetti]

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Colin D Bennett <colin at gibibit.com> wrote:
> Next, I moved the 'cachepath' into one of the branch sections of
> loggerhead.conf.  This made that branch faster after I browsed the
> 'changes' pages once.  Each page seemed to be slow the first time, but
> after that, the page was fast.  It is much nicer. :)

That's the expected behavior, so I'm glad you're up and running again.


> Is there any way to get loggerhead to cache things at the shared
> repository level?  It's not a deal breaker, since it looks like I
> already need to specify each branch explicitly in loggerhead.conf.

That's an interesting idea. I'm not 100% sure on the inner-workings of
that part yet, but I think the best time invested is in actually
removing the cache completely, and default making performance good
enough.
If that gets delayed too much, we'll definitely go back and make caching better.

Thanks for the input.


Martin