Equivalent to Mercurial's 'fetch'

[Martin Pool]

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Ben Finney
<bignose+hates-spam at benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> That behaviour already exists for those who use 'merge --pull', since
> sometimes the pull happens (in which case there's nothing to commit)
> and sometimes it doesn't.
>
> In that case, I vote for a single 'merge --automatic' option that
> would be like 'merge --pull' but with the added behaviour of
> automatically committing a merge if the merge was successful.

Well, yes, we had a similar discussion about adding this option, and I
think the same logic makes "merge --auto-commit" sensible.  I would
favour having it separate from pull but giving them one-letter short
names.

-- 
Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/>