Spurious PQM failures?

[Robert Collins]

On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 17:34 +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 17:17 +1000, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> > Aaron Bentley wrote:
> > > I seem to be getting spurious failures when I submit to PQM.
> > > 
> > > There is no reason I can see why my change could result in a socket failure.
> > 
> > It's <https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/225020>.  I think it's happening now
> > because the PQM system was upgraded to hardy recently.
> 
> the machine had its kernel replaced, no other changes were made.
> 
> The kernel was replaced to work around a different bzr bug where Remote*
> tests took around 18 seconds each, causing extremely long merge times.
> 
> I have filed a high priority RT ticket to remove pycurl for now, to work
> around bug 225020; we need to fix that and restore pycurl to the chroot
> or else the pycurl support may well bitrot.

I'm told the pycurl removal has been done, so merges should be able to
land smoothly now.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080524/8f030d9a/attachment.pgp