updating checkouts with no upstream changes

[Martin Pool]

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Russ Brown <pickscrape at gmail.com> wrote:

>  My expectation is that if I'm updating, and the upstream branch doesn't
> have any new revisions that I don't have already, it shouldn't do anything.

... but if it does have new changes, they should be pulled in and your
local changes should become pending merges, as at present?

That sounds reasonable to me.  Completeness suggests there should be
some way to force your local changes off to the side even if there are
no upstream commits, but maybe that shouldn't be the default.

Unless someone replies to disagree, could you file a bug for this?  It
should be a pretty small change if you want to try it.

-- 
Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/>