Workflows, rebase, patch theory

[Russel Winder]

On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 10:46 +1000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:

[ . . . ]

> To be clear, I'm not against rebasing - it's a useful tool at selected
> times, but I do think it's a mistake to be making it a standard part of
> one's modus operandi. If anyone is telling you that rebasing is a best
> practice, I'd provocatively suggest they are more interested in looking
> good to their peers than collaborating with their peers. Time for me to
> duck for cover about now ... :-)

If you had said "they are interested in looking good to their managers
rather than collaborating with their peers." then that would not have
been provocative, it would have been a statement of truth.  Sadly.

-- 
Russel.
====================================================
Dr Russel Winder                 Partner

Concertant LLP                   t: +44 20 7585 2200, +44 20 7193 9203
41 Buckmaster Road,              f: +44 8700 516 084
London SW11 1EN, UK.             m: +44 7770 465 077
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080508/7e9e99e1/attachment.pgp