[RFC] Represent Loom threads using branches

[Robert Collins]

On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 08:25 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I've been using the loom plugin pretty heavily, and I still feel like
> loom threads should be branches.

My initial feelings are this is going to be hugely more complex for
managing the loom history, and have significant performance implications
too. (I expect large loom scenarios to number in the hundreds of
patches). It will also remove the deliberate simplification of threads
(which is not an implementation detail, its a deliberate design
decision).

I will read your mail in more detail over the next couple of days.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080501/30542828/attachment.pgp