[PREVIEW] line-endings support

Jelmer Vernooij jelmer at samba.org
Tue Apr 15 13:08:12 BST 2008

Am Dienstag, den 15.04.2008, 10:11 +0300 schrieb Alexander Belchenko:
> Ian Clatworthy пишет:
> > Talden wrote:
> >> I agree that
> >> - EOL conversion shouldn't be applied by default (behaviour won't
> >> change with upgrades unless requested).
> >> - Flags controlling EOL conversion should be version controlled
> >> (needed for history stability).
> > 
> > So if our initial cut of eol support stored it's settings in user
> > configuration files (like bazaar.conf and locations.conf), that would be
> > a problem? Or just suboptimal?
> In my understanding using bazaar.conf to store this properties -- means
> follow mercurial way. And this is way to nowhere.
I think it's an acceptable way to start adding eol support because it
doesn't add any burdens on format upgrades in the future. 

It's always possible to add tree-bound eol policy support later.


Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
Jabber: jelmer at jabber.fsfe.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080415/b83e0505/attachment.pgp 

More information about the bazaar mailing list