[RFC] question about different behavior of WorkingTree.iter_changes

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alexander Belchenko wrote:

> Can you shed some light why you said:
> 
> "id2path is a surprisingly expensive operation, and if you're doing it
> repeatedly, it's best to do something else instead."

I think my advice is a bit out-of-date.  I remember that it used to be
expensive to hit id2path for every path in the tree for inventory-based
trees, like RevisionTrees.  For dirstate-based trees, I guess
tree.id2path very efficient.  Sorry for any time of yours that I've wasted.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIAPLs0F+nu1YWqI0RAscoAKCCmFh/h1ifvMRNcryxdq48atNBLgCeIfBW
VI5r8y/accGBbeJXvGnZBWM=
=LBmw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----