[RFC] question about different behavior of WorkingTree.iter_changes

[Alexander Belchenko]

Aaron Bentley пишет:
> Alexander Belchenko wrote:
>> Aaron Bentley ?8H5B:
>>> Alexander Belchenko wrote:
>>>> It's inevitable for me to use id2path for this cases because I need
>>>> to know
>>>> file basename or at least its file extension.
>>> I don't see why that follows; the basename is an attribute of inventory
>>> entries.  You don't need id2path to find out the basename.
>> *blink*
> 
>> Can you point me to right place, please: what I should use instead id2path
>> if I'm only need basename?
> 
> InventoryEntry.name
> 
> It's also available on dirstate entries as "entry[0][1]".
> 
>> But what about path2id? Actually it's not big deal if path2id will be slow,
>> because right now it's used only in WT2&3 supporting code (in HashCache).
> 
> Also preferable to avoid path2id.  If paths2ids is good enough for you,
> use that.  Generally, the multiple-result operations are more efficient
> than the single-result operations.

Thank you. I will try to go this way.