[RFC] question about different behavior of WorkingTree.iter_changes

[Alexander Belchenko]

Alexander Belchenko пишет:
> Attached patch allow me to partially reproduce this problem
> with bzr.dev 3359. Running bzr status in the patched branch
> I've got this numbers:
> 
> python bzr --no-plugins --no-aliases st
> time: 1.406 sec.
> 
> python bzr --no-plugins --no-aliases st -S
> time: 2.156 sec.

I found the way to reduce this numbers to 1.260 seconds and now
I'm worrying less. But still curious why this effect take place.
But not curious enough to disturb other guys on weekend.