What constitutes the "identity" of a changeset?
p.f.moore at gmail.com
Sat Mar 29 00:03:43 GMT 2008
On 28/03/2008, James Westby <jw+debian at jameswestby.net> wrote:
> The problem with bzr's normal scheme for assigning names to revisions
> is known as the "parallel imports" problem. If I were to take
> all the tarballs ever released of the linux kernel and import
> each in to bzr and then commit it I would have a representation of
> the history of the kernel. Then if you were to do exactly the same
> steps you would also have a representation of the same history.
> However, using bzr's default scheme bzr would not consider these
> two branches identical, i.e. they would have different names for
> the last revision.
Yes, I think that's where I'm seeing a difference. Your post has
included a lot for me to think about. I'll ponder it and see where
that leads me :-)
Thanks for taking the time to explain,
More information about the bazaar