Help with LaunchPad

[SuperMMX]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi, John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> :

On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:11:14 -0500
John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> wrote:

> Can you tell us which branch this is? I haven't seen this particular failure
> before, and I would like to investigate.

~supermmx/jaccent/trunk-corrupt

> Specifically, it shouldn't be possible to ^C a push and end up with something
> corrupt. As if the push is interrupted we should just not reference the
> incomplete data.

Here is the steps (on Windows) :

bps is the alias of "bzr push"

1) time bps --remember bzr+ssh://supermmx@bazaar.launchpad.net/~supermmx/jaccent/trunk 
Unable to obtain lock lp--1217904948:///lock
held by supermmx at gmail.com on host xuama-wxp02 [process #17416]
locked 8 minutes, 48 seconds ago
Will continue to try until 10:24:39

bzr: ERROR: Could not acquire lock "(remote lock)"

real    6m15.812s
user    0m0.015s
sys     0m0.015s

2) time bps --remember bzr+ssh://supermmx@bazaar.launchpad.net/~supermmx/jaccent/trunk 
Unable to obtain lock lp--1217970484:///lock
held by supermmx at gmail.com on host xuama-wxp02 [process #17416]
locked 15 minutes, 8 seconds ago
Will continue to try until 10:30:59

real    1m15.109s
user    0m0.046s
sys     0m0.077s

3) time bps --remember --overwrite bzr+ssh://supermmx@bazaar.launchpad.net/~supermmx/jaccen
t/trunk 
Unable to obtain lock lp--1217835316:///lock
held by supermmx at gmail.com on host xuama-wxp02 [process #17416]
locked 16 minutes, 50 seconds ago
Will continue to try until 10:32:40

real    0m48.407s
user    0m0.046s
sys     0m0.047s

4) bzr break-lock bzr+ssh://supermmx@bazaar.launchpad.net/~supermmx/jaccent/trunk

Break lock bzr+ssh://supermmx@bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Esupermmx/jaccent/trunk/.bzr/branch/lock
held by supermmx at gmail.com on host xuama-wxp02 [process #17416]
locked 25 minutes, 18 seconds ago? [y/n]: y

5) time bps --remember --overwrite bzr+ssh://supermmx@bazaar.launchpad.net/~supermmx/jaccen
t/trunk 
Pushed up to revision 3.

real    3m9.047s
user    0m0.031s
sys     0m0.046s

So, here only the last 3 revisions are pushed, while there should be 178.

- -- 
A. Because it makes the logic of the discussion difficult to follow.
Q. Why shoudn't I top post?
A. No.
Q Should I top post?

A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation
Q: Why is it bad?
A: No, it's bad.
Q: Should I top post in replies to mailing lists? 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAkflGDsACgkQYjhzyV/TMxtcKgCfepmyWtQKjPXjSQ/rL9NyLClA
Cc8An3AbNER67r+hDSlHB20ybFxDzQhs
=VdK5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----