bzr 1.3rc1 today/tomorrow, final next week

[John Arbash Meinel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin Pool wrote:
> Alexander said:
> 
>> I think you should finally merge your approved patch for bug 183391
> 
> Done, thanks for mentioning it.
> 
> On 15/03/2008, John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> wrote:
>> Don't we also need to do some stuff to be officially Gnu Bazaar? At the
>>  very least the website needs updating. I thought we would certainly
>>  include it in NEWS or README or something in the project as well. I
>>  don't know what was planned/requested. I just realize that nothing
>>  actually occurred.
> 
> I added a note about it on the Bazaar homepage, and have reposted the
> mail announcement into
> <https://edge.launchpad.net/bzr/+announcements/>
> 
> I've added just this to the README for now:
> 
> === modified file 'README'
> --- README     2008-01-04 00:42:06 +0000
> +++ README      2008-03-16 00:03:19 +0000
> @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
>  =================
> 
>  Bazaar (``bzr``) is a decentralized revision control system, designed to be
> -easy for developers and end users alike.
> +easy for developers and end users alike.  Bazaar is part of the GNU project to
> +develop a complete free operating system.
> 
>  To install Bazaar from source, follow the instructions in the INSTALL
>  file. Otherwise, you may want to check your distribution package manager
> 
> and will mention it in the NEWS for this release, of course.  I didn't
> find anything else required by the maintainer guide or code standards.
>  We could also add "Bazaar is part of the GNU project" to the
> --version output.
> 
>>  > The main remaining thing is to improve the speed of annotate on packs,
>>  > which is very important and John's focus now.  We should land the
>>  > patches he has done on this, but not stall 1.3 waiting for more.
>>
>> I had 2 specific patches for this, which have now been submitted (since
>>  I finally was able to get decent net access at pycon). I'm still working
>>  on it, and I'm planning on sending a email for us to discuss it.
> 
> The one from you that I currently see up for review is
> 
> http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/request/%3C47DB7DC7.8080400@arbash-meinel.com%3E
> 
> I'll try to read that today.> And I agree with Aaron that the weekly
> emails were good for keeping
>>  everyone on track. I realize with all the sprints and everything all of
>>  our schedules got a bit out of whack, but maybe we can get back in sync.
>>  (Of course, for the next release I'll be on vacation...)
> 
> It was just that.  I agree it's very useful.
> 

I was actually talking about sending an email about an annotation cache.
The patch I put up isn't anything critical, though it is a nice small boost.

John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH3DkJJdeBCYSNAAMRAgvSAJ9b73yl+3O1Wj+GjBZh8bbrTNEsCQCeIcXp
JkxgPhF09GtPOZOXxuEMeG8=
=3aKt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----