Emacs Bazaar repository

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy at imag.fr>
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:58:13 +0100
> Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse.de>, emacs-devel at gnu.org,
> 	bazaar at lists.canonical.com
> 
> > Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse.de> writes:
> >
> >> My first impression is that bzr is slow, so slow that it is completely
> >> unusable.  How can it come that a simple bzr log takes more than a
> >> minute to even start?  Even cvs log is instantaneous in comparison,
> >> although it has to request the log from the server.
> [...]
> As opposed to that, bzr has to get a global view of history at least
> to get the revision numbers (there was some plans caching this
> information, I don't know what's the status).
> 
> That said, the time for bzr log to start should clearly not be _that_
> long.

Incidentally, why are we concentrating on "bzr log"? is that a
frequent operation?  With CVS, I find myself doing "cvs log" only once
in a few months, when I'm looking for a change corresponding to some
ChangeLog entry.

Aren't "push" and "pull" much more important, as far as speed is
concerned, for everyday work?  Also the equivalent of "cvs diff", I
think.  Those are the ops I use much more frequently than "log" and
"annotate".