Bisect plugin updated
mbp at canonical.com
Fri Feb 29 09:37:54 GMT 2008
On 29/02/2008, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 12:12 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Jeff Licquia wrote:
> > > Finally, despite my skepticism to poor Toshio Kuratomi, I am open to
> > > requests to pull the bisect plugin into some larger collection, into
> > > core, or wherever people think is best.
> > >
> > I would love to see this merged into the core so the git fanatics would
> > stop hounding me about git bisect :-). Looks like the license matches
> > and there are tests so what needs to happen? Someone needs to propose a
> > patch that puts the files into the bzr source tree and make sure that
> > the build picks up the plugin and the test suite?
I would support that too. Let's do it.
I talked to Robert about this; I don't think we completely agree but
we understand each other.
For things that are relatively small amounts of code, stable,
applicable to many users, reasonably tested, and where the original
author agrees to it, I think we should merge them in. It is
technically possible to keep them in separate branches but review
them, test them together and build them into one tarball, but that is
more complex and I don't think it's much better than just merging them
I'm still in favor of having better infrastructure for plugins and
helping people find and install the right plugins.
More information about the bazaar