[MERGE][RFC] Proposed version 3 of smart server protocol

[Martin Pool]

On 05/02/2008, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 12:21 +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> > )
> >
> > One thing this leaves open is that there is no way for the receiver
> > (which could be either client or server) to interrupt a streaming
> > message body.  It has to always receive the whole thing, or drop the
> > connection.
>
> We currently work on the basis of a half-duplex connection.

Right, this would be a change from that approach, and so perhaps for
simplicity we should defer it.  I don't have a strong opinion that we
either should or shouldn't do it; I just thought I'd mention it.

-- 
Martin