[MERGE] improve new branch from a smart server
Andrew Bennetts
andrew at canonical.com
Mon Feb 4 04:44:52 GMT 2008
Robert Collins wrote:
> Making a new branch from a smart server was generating a full
> revision-history when it wasn't needed, this is expensive (particularly
> on long lived projects).
bb:tweak
I say "tweak" just because I wouldn't mind a test showing that RemoteBranch
doesn't fetch the full revision history with this method. IIRC, it shouldn't be
too hard to do along the lines of the existing test_remote tests.
This is clearly a good (and simple) change though. I won't mind much if you
decide to just merge as-is if you think the effort of writing such a test would
be disproportionate to benefit it would give.
-Andrew.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list