[MERGE] Make pack formats non-experimental, rich-root formats non-hidden, and mark subtree ones as experimental.
Adeodato Simó
dato at net.com.org.es
Mon Jan 14 09:33:41 GMT 2008
* Aaron Bentley [Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:22:52 -0500]:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Here's a new version of the patch, which gives the experimental flag to
> > the subtree formats. I've made the subtree format non-hidden, just
> > experimental. If this is not desired (why?), I can send another patch.
> The subtree format enables pre-alpha features. It reduces performance
> and can cause strange behavior. I strongly recommend against its use,
> so it is hidden and considered "experimental".
OK, I've readded the hidden flag as well in the attached directive. The
subject of this email summarizes the final result.
> > I've commented in the patch (à-la /usr/bin/diff -p) the format each
> > change refers to, because otherwise the diff was very difficult to read.
> The patch in a merge directive is not used to perform the merge. It's a
> preview for reviewers. If the patch doesn't match the changes that are
> being requested, there's a possibility of fraud. Therefore, we verify
> that the patch matches the changes that are being requested. Yours
> fails verification because you edited it:
I was aware of this, but I thought it only verified the contents of the
patch. My previous patch only contained comments after the @@ lines.
I've refrained from doing that this time.
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
- I couldn't find anything in there for days. I kept reaching in for
strawberries and coming up with liver -- that's not pleasant.
- I promise not to touch the fridge again.
-- Sookie and Lorelai
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bzr.pack_no_experimental-3.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 4431 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20080114/4f093ba7/attachment.bin
More information about the bazaar
mailing list