Incorrect results from annotate on packs

Robert Collins robertc at robertcollins.net
Sun Dec 30 02:04:09 GMT 2007


On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 20:47 -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 03:14 -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> >> Well, I don't.  My research shows that the ancestry of this line is
> >> quite complicated.  I've attached a DAG in dot and SVG format, as well
> >> as the patch I used to generate it.
> >>
> >> But to me it looks like the line was originated in four different
> >> revisions, and until revno 3052, we never reached synchronization.
> > 
> > I'd *really* love it if we could list these rather than attributing to
> > the merging revision.
> 
> I'm open to changing it, I just want to be careful.
> 
> Now, are you saying you'd like an annotate interface that could list
> multiple originating versions?  Or just pick one?
> 
> And why do we use the merging version for files?  Does that rationale
> apply to lines as well?

I'll get to this late next week; needs paging in too much right now.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20071230/347c8a22/attachment.pgp 


More information about the bazaar mailing list