[MERGE] [1.0] [#175764] Improve bug tracker integration documentation

Jonathan Lange jml at mumak.net
Mon Dec 17 07:25:09 GMT 2007


On Dec 17, 2007 5:34 PM, Ian Clatworthy <ian.clatworthy at internode.on.net> wrote:
>
> Martin Pool wrote:
> >> I hope you're not looking for documentation on the valid bug statuses,
> >> because AFAIK, there isn't any.  My comment was meant as an aside, not a
> >> resubmit requirement.
> >
> > For Launchpad, I would presume they are the one-word statuses as in
> >
> >    https://help.launchpad.net/BugTrackerEmailInterface
> >
> > I'm not sure if there's been any attempt to standardize them across trackers.
> >
>
> In terms of the 'status' we put into revision metadata, jml tells me the
> only supported value is 'fixed'.
>

That's right.

During our original discussions on this list (IIRC), we decided to
keep things simple for the initial implementation. Out of all the
other possible statuses, I think that only 'inprogress' and perhaps a
Trac-style 'refs' are genuinely useful.

jml



More information about the bazaar mailing list