Confused about the output of 'bzr log --f --limit=X'
Vincent Ladeuil
v.ladeuil+lp at free.fr
Fri Dec 14 14:25:18 GMT 2007
>>>>> "adeato" == Adeodato Simó <dato at net.com.org.es> writes:
adeato> * Vincent Vertigo [Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:59:47 +0100]:
>> Hi,
>> First, using bzr from command-line, I find the 'forward /
>> --f' option mandatory as soon as my branch exceeds 50
>> revisions: I am usually more interested in the log of my
>> latest revisions,
Me too.
>> and it seems more logical to me in that chronological
>> order.
They are in *a* chronological order ;-)
I think most of "us" use it in conjunction with --limit in such a
way that it does not exceed a screen length. Then we read what we
are more interested in in logical order too: starting with the
most recent ones.
>> Am I the only one?
No, your point of view is valid too.
<snip/>
adeato> I definitely see an argument for changing it to
adeato> "limit the output to the N *newest* revisions". I'd
adeato> be glad to hear what the developers think about this.
I agree with that too.
Vincent
More information about the bazaar
mailing list