Bazaar is ignored in some places?

[David Clymer]

On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 12:06 -0600, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > Am Samstag, den 08.12.2007, 14:17 +0200 schrieb Alexander Belchenko:
> >> I found that in some places Bazaar specially or not but ignored.
> >>
> >> 1) http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
> >> Well known comparison between various SCM. Bazaar (as well as git) is not mentioned at all.
> >> Many people point to this table, although I don't see any real profit from it.
> > I think simply that (missing git and bzr) indicates how old that table
> > is. Perhaps we could ask the author to get it updated?
> 
> I believe the author of that table has been asked to update. But refuses to
> believe that "bzr" is anything different from Arch, since Bazaar was once a
> fork of Arch, before -ng was written.

I emailed the author recently, suggesting an update and explaining that
it wasn't just an arch fork anymore, and was referred here:

http://better-scm.berlios.de/contribute/#comprison_new_system

So, if anyone wants to be a "champion"...

-davidc

-- 
gpg-key: http://www.zettazebra.com/files/key.gpg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20071209/de69e1b1/attachment.pgp