Bazaar is ignored in some places?

John Arbash Meinel john at arbash-meinel.com
Sat Dec 8 18:06:01 GMT 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 08.12.2007, 14:17 +0200 schrieb Alexander Belchenko:
>> I found that in some places Bazaar specially or not but ignored.
>>
>> 1) http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
>> Well known comparison between various SCM. Bazaar (as well as git) is not mentioned at all.
>> Many people point to this table, although I don't see any real profit from it.
> I think simply that (missing git and bzr) indicates how old that table
> is. Perhaps we could ask the author to get it updated?

I believe the author of that table has been asked to update. But refuses to
believe that "bzr" is anything different from Arch, since Bazaar was once a
fork of Arch, before -ng was written.

John
=:->


> 
>> 2) Slackware Linux.
>> One is the oddest Linux distribution with his one-man-dictator -- Patrick -- maintainer.
>> There is git and Mercurial, but no Bazaar.
> I started out using Slackware when I was first looking at Linux, but
> it's been a while since I've touched it. None of the people I know that
> were running Slackware still are.  Does Slackware still matter?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jelmer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHWt0JJdeBCYSNAAMRAjQfAJ9GxY1+RPuF9ZtDJV2tGrq7w2l4jACgiGnr
m4qRGWtlubHk64IGH2Grx5k=
=bnmB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the bazaar mailing list