[MERGE][1.0] Rename pack-0.92 to pack-0-92 to fix User Reference generation
Alexander Belchenko
bialix at ukr.net
Fri Dec 7 06:23:25 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Belchenko пишет:
> Ian Clatworthy ?8H5B:
>> Checking the User Reference generation today, it was broken because ReST
>> gets confused if an option has a '.' in it. The init, init-repo and
>> upgrade commands all have that due to the pack-0.92 format name being
>> options.
>
>> This patch fixes that by renaming the format to pack-0-92. We could make
>> it pack-092 if people prefer. It doesn't matter a lot UI wise because
>> it's the default now anyway, but the pattern ought to be consistent
>> going forward and I think the '-' in place of a '.' is better than
>> leaving it out.
>
> Ian, I think we can rename it in generate_docs script to pack-0-92 or pack-0_92
> and then after html generation rename it back to pack-0.92.
>
> It's ugly hack, but it works now. It probably break our docs if one day --pack-0.92 will be referred
> from body text.
No, I'm wrong here. It will not break anything -- because we do pair conversion for all texts.
Ian, can you review my patch as merge request? It will be really nice to ship rc2 with good bzr_man.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHWObdzYr338mxwCURAqw9AKCIFnN+0kW7Cv5uYduB227c6bfA/QCfaNFA
pg8PzBuVyxQW7IFiZREh1eU=
=LxVx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar
mailing list