[RFC] The packrepo.txt document still talks KnitPack internally

Robert Collins robertc at robertcollins.net
Wed Nov 28 00:18:01 GMT 2007


On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 11:13 +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> > Hmm. I'm less worried about that (but it easy to change if we want).
> 
> Maybe the real bug here is that users (who should see it as
> 'packs-0.92') are being directed to developer documentation (which
> should use whatever name is used in the source)?

Well, I still regard packs as a developer/informed user format. There
are sufficient caveats about how they perform that the best
documentation for them is developer documentation. (Slightly influenced
here by Keith Packards assertion about data format clarity being
important).

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20071128/ff08768e/attachment.pgp 


More information about the bazaar mailing list