UI confusion / consistency
Aaron Bentley
aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca
Thu Nov 22 21:58:41 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Yeah, I agree - and I think that makes sense. However, it would be nice
> if this was more consistent - that's why I brought up "bzr conflicts"
> and "bzr ignore".
Well, I agree about "ignore", but I think it should be equivalent to
"add". For "conflicts", we can't seem to agree about "status" display,
so there's no point changing conflicts until then.
Since we're a whole tree tool, I think we should show all changes. But
others think we should only show changes encompassed by the cwd. I
think that if your write operations are whole-tree, your read operations
should also be.
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHRfuR0F+nu1YWqI0RAnB7AJ9IPgEqIgEDx3DuHXTV7VBKjYLcRgCfcanK
GwQsv6Sa13N9XaBPWVuH5DU=
=5FRR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar
mailing list