[PATCH] Add support for filezilla server
Blake Winton
bwinton at latte.ca
Tue Oct 9 19:18:36 BST 2007
John Arbash Meinel wrote:
>> Could someone with access to a filezilla server write some sort of
>> Mock-filezilla transport which doesn't connect to a back-end, but
>> instead returns the responses that a real filezilla server would return?
> Well, you could adapt our testing ftp server (which uses Medusa). I
> don't think it would be terribly hard to hack the error strings.
That's the generic "you", right? :)
> But there could always be a bit of drift versus the real filezilla (what
> happens if they decide they need clearer error messages, etc.). I
> suppose it still gives a reasonable point of entry.
Even if there was drift, continuing to check code against a version of
filezilla which we've seen in the wild isn't a horrible idea.
> Then again, I'm fine with just merging the fix, and not worrying too
> much about the details.
Same here. I just thought I'ld point out a way that this could be
tested, if someone were motivated to test it.
Later,
Blake.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list