[RFC] remove rspush?
Jelmer Vernooij
jelmer at samba.org
Fri Oct 5 17:41:25 BST 2007
Am Freitag, den 05.10.2007, 12:24 -0400 schrieb Aaron Bentley:
> The bzrtools rspush command was essential in the days when we didn't
> have integrated push support, but these days, it seems redundant. I
> haven't used it in at least a year.
>
> Worse yet, it's out of date. It doesn't know how to deal with anything
> except standalone trees, and doesn't even work with working tree format 4.
>
> And no one has noticed that it was broken 'till recently. So I think
> it's time to retire it. Any objections?
I know some of the other Samba developers are using it heavily for one
of their projects, where pushing trees within a sane amount of time is
impossible without rspush. I think they're still on an older version of
bzr and bzrtools, but I think it will still be very valuable until packs
land. Personally, I still use rsync for initial push although I just
invoke the command directly.
Cheers,
Jelmer
--
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
Jabber: jelmer at jabber.fsfe.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20071005/89408c39/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar
mailing list