[MERGE] annotate on working tree with edits

Aaron Bentley aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca
Fri Oct 5 16:20:16 BST 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John Arbash Meinel wrote:
>> In theory, we don't need branch, because we have rev_id.
> 
> I'm pretty sure we do, because we want the dotted revnos to be relative to the
> branch tip, not the revision_id we are annotating.

Good point.  That should be documented.

> Also, we need a place to *get* all of those revision => revision_ids

You mean a place to get the mapping of revision-id to dotted-revno?

> I agree that we should favor tree over branch. Just that we've been maintaining
> api compatibility.

Right.  I was suggesting adding a new function with the right signature,
not changing the existing function's signature in incompatible ways.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHBlYw0F+nu1YWqI0RAv00AKCF0kwVkGrKWHLaOJKy4+5LwoPU3wCfRNOr
IcmwBJyo6sthWxsmB7zZAi4=
=roBF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the bazaar mailing list