[MERGE] Fix log against smart server branches that don't support tags. (#140615)

[Robert Collins]

On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 20:04 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> Remote (i.e. smart server) branches claim that they support tags for all
> branches, so if the underlying branch doesn't (it is an old format) the
> DisabledTags will be used instead. However they didn't implement the new
> get_reverse_tag_dict, so log failed against them.
> 
> The test is very low level, and doesn't actually test the symptom, as I wasn't
> sure how to set up the necessary branch.

bb:approve

A nice future improvement should you feel like it would be to provide
per-tag-interface tests, one of which would test the minimum interface
(e.g. that of a regular/readonly/disabled tags environment) and one
would test the mutable tags interface.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20070919/1ca527d5/attachment.pgp