[MERGE] Minor tree and dirstate code cleanups
Ian Clatworthy
ian.clatworthy at internode.on.net
Fri Sep 14 02:59:24 BST 2007
Robert Collins wrote:
> -header line = "#bazaar dirstate flat format 2", NL;
> +header line = "#bazaar dirstate flat format N", NL;
>
> This is an incorrect change to make. Its not a substitution variable,
> its is the specification for format 2.
But it's up to 3 now. Is 2-> 3 ok with you?
>
> This hunk:
> - :return: a set of (path, file ids) for the specified filenames
> + :return: a set of file ids for the specified filenames
> """
> not_versioned = []
> interesting_ids = set()
>
> looks suspicious
It does but it's correct. The doc really is wrong.
> What is this:
> @@ -275,7 +274,8 @@
> def _directory_is_tree_reference(self, relpath):
> # as a special case, if a directory contains control files
> then
> # it's a tree reference, except that the root of the tree is
> not
> - return relpath and osutils.isdir(self.abspath(relpath) +
> u"/.bzr")
> + return len(relpath) > 0 and \
> + osutils.isdir(self.abspath(relpath) + u"/.bzr")
>
> change for?
I was trying to make it clear that we're testing for 'not root'.
relpath != ''
would be equally clear or perhaps better. If relpath was 0 (very
unlikely), the test would fail unexpectedly. It's not so much an issue
with Python but this paranoia comes from my Perl days when a directory
called '0' really would be evaluated as False.
I'm happy to back that bit out btw - just explaining why I changed it.
Ian C.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list