[RFC] tweak merge-approval criterion: performance

[Marius Kruger]

On 9/4/07, Ian Clatworthy <ian.clatworthy at internode.on.net> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure profiling every potential change by hand is practical. If
> it's automated PQM-like, that's different. Until then, I think some
> focussed performance regression testing during the freeze period - which
> I've been doing for some months BTW - together with keeping up good
> reviews is acceptable.
>

I think it would be good to have performance testing suite,

which could print the times for certain things, and at the end
we can assert if its acceptable compared to previous runs.

It might make sense to get some system running these tests
on a weekly basis and post the improvements or disimprovements
to the list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20070905/0e1e63ee/attachment.htm