Filename normalisation handling

[Robert Collins]

On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 16:51 +1000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
> 
> I'm hoping the short answer is that the test is broken - it doesn't
> need
> the "rename to something than cannot be normalised" scenario to test
> id2path anyway. I don't pretend to have the long answer and suspect
> I'm
> opening a Padora's box? If our position hasn't changed, should I take
> something like
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/77657/comments/3 and
> put it into the FAQ? Well clearer in the FAQ than it is currently? 

I suspect that the scenario the test is testing is:
On linux add a unicode filename, commit.
Go to MacOS X, make a copy of the branch.
bzr commit.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20070821/1f6f0179/attachment.pgp