[MERGE] Re: "update -r REVNO" support

Robert Widhopf-Fenk hack at robf.de
Sat Aug 18 08:59:46 BST 2007


On Friday, August 17, 2007 at 13:51:07, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Aaron Bentley has voted resubmit. Status is now: Resubmit Comment:
> The implementation of revision_id_to_revno is broken, because it
> assumes that the last_revision of the working tree is present in the
> branch's map of revisions to dotted revnos.
> 
> As I've pointed out before, we never get the revno of the working
> tree.  What I should have said more clearly is that I don't want to
> *start* doing that.  I think it will only lead to more confusion.
> (But I would vote "abstain" if that were the only issue.)

I was not aware of these "internals" of BZR  ;-)

Anyway, I will be away for 2,5 months and will not make any
fixes to this bundle anymore.  So if anyone else wants to
pick it up and fix the problems that remain, please do so.

Have a good time,
Robert



More information about the bazaar mailing list