[merge] rename 0.19 to 0.90

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin Pool wrote:
> On 8/9/07, Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca> wrote:
> 
>> I see that you have not updated the format marker for merge directive
>> format 2.  (Bundle format 4 doesn't have one, for compatibility with old
>> readers.)
> 
> Thanks for catching that.  I fixed it in the second patch.
> 
>> I don't think that "emotional version numbers" fit very well with our
>> development practices.
> 
> Can you explain more what you mean?

0.9 is a number that suggests "almost ready", in an emotional sense.

Using 0.9 to signify that Bazaar is "almost ready" would be nice, but
it's not really compatible with time-based releases.  (We blew past it
10 releases ago.)

> For our strictly time based cycles, maybe the best fit would actually
> be to just name them by the date they come out, and have no
> connotations about them being major or minor releases.

Or just increment a number with every release, which is close to what we
have been doing.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGu95a0F+nu1YWqI0RAlrtAJkBqQhV9F6ohds8HH89pEXHtA4p5gCeMFVT
iIfK2yUTeJsheuhx8HeYsFg=
=3gMA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----