bzr bundle > file

[Martin Pool]

On 8/8/07, Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca> wrote:
> Resurrecting the old "bundle" implementation wouldn't fix your use case,
> because "bundle" always used the default format, and the default format
> is 4.

(To try and summarize an irc conversation)

I don't care much about the old implementation; if it was ugly then
I'm happy to get rid of it too.  However, I don't think we should just
suddenly change the meaning of the command.  People are accustomed to
writing 'bzr bundle ../OTHER > FILE" and that should still work.
Ideally that can be just syntactic gloss on the current
implementation.

-- 
Martin