Another (unscientific) comparison of Mercurial and Bazaar
Alexander Belchenko
bialix at ukr.net
Tue Jul 31 05:42:31 BST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
http://sayspy.blogspot.com/2007/07/another-unscientific-comparison-of.html
Brett Canon did another comparison Bazaar vs. Mercurial.
Despite the fact he used latest bzr.dev, he don't compile
Pyrex extensions in source tree, because our download page
don't suggest it, as he said.
Of course, our latest release don't have inside Pyrex code,
so I think it's OK, but our INSTALL document in bzr.dev
also don't have any mentions about Pyrex. Although, there is
need for instructions how to compile extensions to run
bzr from sources (make extensions), IMO.
I'm not sure that numbers will be completely different
when bzr runs with compiled extensions, but it's seems
that ignoring John's efforts on performance is not
best idea either.
- --
[µ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGrr23zYr338mxwCURAnTLAJ4zNWJjvXfRQM5XJVo8pbybOSOlzQCfWgLV
ZKkW6WkgWWdR2xiJ7MrCbDw=
=aPZc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar
mailing list