[MERGE] Performance analysis of missing

[Alexander Belchenko]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Vincent Ladeuil пишет:
> Here is a reformulated version of my notes about missing at the
> London sprint.

+A quick and dirty survey indicates that most of the users are interested in
+only one set of revisions at a time.
+

I often use 'missing' to see both sets.

+It has been proposed that the missing command be deprecated in favor of a
+--dry-run option for the push, pull, merge commands.

I'm not sure that --dry-run will be full equivalent, especially because
'missing' show revisions in form of 'log --line', but pull/merge by default don't show
revisions at all, and with 'pull -v' you get both 'log --long' + 'status --short'.

I just want to say that default output of mentioned command is not the same,
and probably it's need to provide some consistence between them and 'missing'.

- --
[µ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGnimnzYr338mxwCURAhDVAJ9S7AkHxijP0AXLc0fZRkYW1JmtgACeIVez
gU8ujQ4KAy6lsWBcJjZBBtY=
=40vQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----